Bollywood superstar Hrithik Roshan’s candid review of Ranveer Singh’s latest spy-action thriller, Dhurandhar, has ignited a fiery debate online, proving that even the biggest stars aren’t afraid to wade into controversial waters. But here’s where it gets controversial: While Roshan heaped praise on the film’s storytelling and cinematic brilliance, he also openly admitted, ‘I may disagree with the politics of it…’—a statement that has left fans and critics alike fiercely divided. And this is the part most people miss: Roshan’s willingness to separate the art from its message has sparked a much-needed conversation about the responsibilities of filmmakers in today’s polarized world.
Dhurandhar has been nothing short of a box office juggernaut, crossing the Rs. 100 crore mark within its first weekend and continuing its unstoppable momentum. By Tuesday, the film had raked in Rs. 28.60 crore, pushing its total domestic net collection past the staggering Rs. 150 crore mark. With Rs. 24.30 crore on Monday and Rs. 28.60 crore on Tuesday, the film now stands at an impressive Rs. 159.40 crore nett in India. This success isn’t just about numbers—it’s a testament to the film’s gripping narrative, its star-studded ensemble cast, and the buzz it has generated through strong word-of-mouth.
Hrithik Roshan’s review, however, has added a layer of complexity to the film’s reception. He praised Dhurandhar for its ability to ‘spin and shake’ audiences, calling it a prime example of cinema at its best. Yet, he didn’t shy away from critiquing its political undertones, stating, ‘I may disagree with the politics of it, and argue about the responsibilities we filmmakers should bear as citizens of the world.’ This nuanced take has earned him both admiration and backlash, with netizens applauding his honesty while others question his stance.
One fan remarked, ‘It’s refreshing to see a star separate the craft from the message instead of hiding behind PR silence.’ Another added, ‘It takes guts to post something like this when even mild criticism can lead to abuse.’ But not everyone is on board. Some argue that Roshan’s comments could alienate a large section of the audience, while others believe he’s overstepping his role as an actor. Bold question for you: Can a film’s political message ever overshadow its artistic merit? Or should we, as audiences, demand more accountability from filmmakers?
What’s fueling Dhurandhar’s momentum? Analysts point to its strong word-of-mouth, positive audience reception, and the undeniable chemistry of its ensemble cast. But Roshan’s review has added a new dimension to the conversation, forcing us to ask: Can we appreciate a film’s craftsmanship while disagreeing with its message? Let’s keep the debate alive—share your thoughts in the comments below!
)
